Legal
Corrections Policy.
Job data and guide content can become stale. This page explains how to report an issue, what helps us review it, and what may depend on employer or source updates.
At a glance
- Fast to review
- Broken links, obvious stale listings, typos, and incorrect page references.
- May depend on source data
- Employer job details, compensation, location rules, and source feed changes.
- Helpful evidence
- Send the page URL, employer, title, issue, and official source if available.
- High-risk content
- Licensure, state-rule, salary, tax, and clinical claims may need source review.
Accuracy matters. ClinicianRemote aggregates third-party listings and publishes salary data and guides, and we want errors fixed when they are found. This policy explains what we correct and how to tell us.
1. What we correct
- Inaccurate job details such as title, employer, compensation, location, or licensure language.
- Listings that appear expired, filled, duplicated, broken, or posted in error.
- Errors in salary ranges, methodology, or licensure and compact guides.
- Broken links, misattributions, or factual mistakes in editorial content.
2. What to send
Email hello@clinicianremote.com or use our contact page. Please include:
- The ClinicianRemote page URL where you saw the issue.
- For job listings: the role title, employer, and source or apply link if visible.
- A short description of what looks wrong.
- An official source for the correction if one is available.
3. What can be corrected quickly
We can usually review broken links, duplicate listings, obvious stale roles, formatting errors, and clear wording issues directly. Where appropriate, we may remove, update, or clarify the affected page.
4. What may depend on employer or source data
Some corrections depend on the employer career site or public source feed. If a listing still appears in a public source but looks incorrect, the fastest fix may depend on the employer or source updating its own page. We may still hide or clarify a listing if it appears unreliable.
5. Our response
We aim to review correction requests as practical, with priority for broken apply links, stale listings, privacy concerns, and high-risk licensure or legal-sensitive content. Response times can vary by issue complexity and source availability.
6. Significant corrections
When a correction materially changes the meaning of editorial content, we may note that the page has been corrected rather than silently editing it.
7. Related
See our Editorial Policy for how content is produced, and our Terms of Use regarding the accuracy of third-party listings.